Emotion Science Simplified: Feedback with feelings

Uncategorized

Feedback isn’t just information. It’s emotional work.

Paper: Feedback with feelings: the human complexity of expressing judgements about performance (Bearman et al., 2025) 

The core idea

We often talk about feedback as if it’s rational, neutral, and technical. This research shows that’s a myth.

Feedback is saturated with feeling. Not just how feedback is received, but how it is given, judged, remembered, and acted on. Emotions aren’t background noise. They're doing the work.


What the researchers studied

The authors observed real feedback moments in high-pressure medical settings (ICU and surgery). They watched. They listened. They traced what feelings did over time.

Not just what people said but:

  • body language

  • tone

  • silences

  • what lingered

  • what people avoided later

This is called focused ethnography, grounded in modern emotion theory.


What they found (the big insights)

1. Judgement and emotion are inseparable

Performance judgements are felt, not just thought. A sigh. A raised eyebrow. A pause. A “neutral” tone.

These are judgements — and they land emotionally. Even when supervisors think they’re being objective, feelings are already in the room.

2. Feelings circulate, stick, and intensify

Emotions don’t stay inside one person. They:

  • circulate between people

  • stick over time

  • intensify long after the moment has passed

A brief comment can shape confidence for months. A single feedback session can trigger avoidance, self-doubt, or withdrawal. This explains why feedback can change behaviour even when it’s vague or indirect.

3. Formal feedback often makes emotions stronger

High-stakes feedback moments (reviews, assessments) amplify feelings. Especially when:

  • criticism is unexpected

  • feedback feels “out of the blue”

  • there’s no shared narrative over time

In these moments, people don’t just reflect — they react. Sometimes by disengaging. Sometimes by avoiding feedback altogether.

4. Relationships change how feedback lands

The same words land differently depending on:

  • trust

  • psychological safety

  • prior experience

When there’s a strong relationship:

  • irritation doesn’t always stick

  • bluntness is easier to metabolise

When trust is weak:

  • small signals loom large

  • body language speaks louder than words

This reinforces what many of you already know: feedback lives inside relationships, not systems.

5. People are judged for how they feel, not just what they do

Supervisors often judged trainees for being:

  • “too aggressive”

  • “not confident enough”

  • “too emotional”

  • “disinterested”

These are emotional norms, not performance facts.

The research also surfaced gendered patterns:

  • anger seen as acceptable in men, problematic in women

  • emotion reframed as “hormonal” or personal

This matters far beyond medicine.


The uncomfortable truth

Trying to “manage” emotions by pushing them aside doesn’t work.

It often:

  • intensifies feelings

  • increases power imbalances

  • creates silence and avoidance

Ignoring emotion doesn’t make feedback cleaner. It makes it leakier.


What this means for leaders, coaches, and facilitators

1. Feelings are not the learner’s problem alone

Emotion isn’t an individual failure to regulate. It’s collective, relational, and contextual. That means responsibility is shared:

  • leaders

  • peers

  • systems

  • cultures

2. Neutrality is not emotionally neutral

A “calm” tone still communicates judgement. Silence still signals meaning.

Process doesn’t cancel power. Being explicit about feelings can reduce their hidden impact.

3. Naming emotion can reduce its intensity

The study suggests something simple but powerful:

Create space to ask:

  • “What’s affecting you right now?”

  • “What stayed with you from that conversation?”

  • “What felt hard about that feedback?”

Not therapy. Not fixing. Just legitimising what’s already there.


Practical actions you can try

Before feedback

  • Build shared expectations over time

  • Avoid surprises

  • Signal care before critique

During feedback

  • Pay attention to your body language and tone

  • Name uncertainty rather than masking it

  • Acknowledge emotion without analysing it

After feedback

  • Invite reflection on how it felt, not just what was learned

  • Check what’s sticking

  • Watch for avoidance — it’s data


Why this matters for emotional culture

This study backs something many of us sense intuitively: Culture is emotional before it is cognitive. Feedback is one of the most powerful emotional culture moments we have.

Handled well, it builds trust and growth. Handled poorly, it quietly erodes confidence and connection. The work is not to eliminate emotion — but to work with it, together.


A practical tool for difficult feedback conversations

At riders&elephants, we’ve designed a structured emotional culture conversation called ECD Difficult Conversations.

It’s designed specifically for moments like feedback conversations — when emotion, judgement, and stakes collide.

The tool helps you:

  • prepare for difficult conversations

  • surface and understand the emotions involved

  • work with those emotions, rather than around them

  • create more honest, humane, and effective dialogue

If feedback often feels harder than it should, this is one way to bring structure and clarity to the emotional work it involves.

Explore ECD Difficult Conversations here →

Close

50% Complete

Two Step

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.